Dear gem5 developers/users,
In order to study memory management techniques in heterogenous memory
environments we have been working on extending gem5 to handle multiple memory
devices (i.e., NUMA). We would like to decrease the time spent on simulating
CPU internals without losing accuracy on
Hi all,
I am running PARSEC benchmark with full system simulation.
The CPU model is O3CPU (parameters tuned) with ARM ISA and MESI_Three_Level
protocol were used. (build/ARM_MESI_Three_Level/gem5.opt) While the
benchmark is running, panic occurs since the L0 cache controller gets
unsupported type
lucky19...@iiitd.ac.in
Regards,
*Lucky Agarwal*
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
Hi Daecheol,
You're correct that MESI_Three_Level, like MESI_Two_Level has a shared
(banked) LLC.
The L2 cache is chosen based on the function "mapAddressToRange" (see
https://gem5.googlesource.com/public/gem5/+/refs/heads/stable/src/mem/ruby/protocol/MESI_Three_Level-L1cache.sm#403
).
The
Hi all,
I am making a system consisting of multiple CPU clusters using
MESI_Three_Level.
Since the MESI three level enable users to make multiple clusters, and each
cluster can have multiple L2 caches, I just thought that L1 caches within
the cluster can only access the L2 cache in the same