Re: [gem5-users] Dynamic Associative cache in gem5

: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Date: Friday, 4 May 2018 at 11:16 To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Dynamic Associative cache in gem5 Dear Nikos, I have seen that we can bypass snoopfilter in "coherent_xbar.cc&

Re: [gem5-users] Dynamic Associative cache in gem5

t;> which have the exact same property of carrying dirty data without the >> additional property of implying an eviction. >> >> Nikos >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *gem5-users <gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org> on behalf of Muhammad >> Avais &l

Re: [gem5-users] Dynamic Associative cache in gem5

users-boun...@gem5.org> on behalf of Muhammad > Avais <avais.suh...@gmail.com> > *Reply-To: *gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> > *Date: *Thursday, 3 May 2018 at 06:44 > *To: *gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> > *Subject: *[gem5-users] Dynam

Re: [gem5-users] Dynamic Associative cache in gem5

ply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Date: Thursday, 3 May 2018 at 06:44 To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> Subject: [gem5-users] Dynamic Associative cache in gem5 Dear All, I am trying tom implement dynamic associative cache. I have foun

[gem5-users] Dynamic Associative cache in gem5

Dear All, I am trying tom implement dynamic associative cache. I have found that after decreasing the associativity, if i do not invalidate blocks then following problem occurs. Actually, i do not want to invaliate blocks that are out of associativity, can anyone suggest some solution #0