That works. Thank you, Pedro.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:36 PM Pedro Henrique Exenberger Becker <
pe...@ac.upc.edu> wrote:
> You can try `git commit -m "my message" - n`
>
> -n is the short version of - -no-verify flag.
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-commit
>
> However your commits won't be compl
You can try `git commit -m "my message" - n`
-n is the short version of - -no-verify flag.
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-commit
However your commits won't be compliant with gem5 standards. I guess this
can be a problem if you want to push your code/modifications to the main
repo some day, but I'm
(Please be sure to look at my question at the bottom of this message. Also,
please excuse the length of the message--I want it to be complete.)
You were assigned to review my first Gem5 check-in, so you are getting this
annoying email. I'm sorry about that, but I do not know who would be a bette
Patch to further update GCN3 webpage posted:
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5-website/+/50907
Matt
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:10 PM Matt Sinclair
wrote:
> Thanks Kyle! I agree we should probably just update the documentation
> Imad found to point to the gem5-resources document
Dear all,
I looked at fetch.cc for the O3CPU and in particular looked at the function
which calls the branch predictor.
bool Fetch::lookupAndUpdateNextPC(const DynInstPtr &inst, TheISA::PCState
&nextPC)
Here are the first couple of lines for quick reference:
bool predict_taken;
if (
Yeah. I would suggest working on a native linux machine if you're going to
use KVM. If you're not using KVM, then WSL *should* (no promises ;)) work
OK.
Cheers,
Jason
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:21 PM Reiko Matsuda-dunn <
reiko.matsudad...@colorado.edu> wrote:
> Thanks for the resources! Seems lik
Thanks for the resources! Seems like quite a can of worms.It's almost
looking like it could be easier to partition a computer for Linux and start
over. Would you recommend that as an alternative?
All th
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 1:36 PM Jason Lowe-Power via gem5-users <
gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote:
Hi Reiko,
The KVM CPU requires that the host platform supports KVM. Given that you're
using WSL, this means that you need to have nested virtualization enabled
and implemented on your WSL kernel.
https://www.reddit.com/r/bashonubuntuonwindows/comments/ldbyxa/what_is_the_current_state_of_kvm_accele
Hello,
I'm trying to troubleshoot this error (output below). I've looked at prior
posts in this mailing list and was able to change perf_event_paranoid to -1
( I confirmed this with $cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid, which
returns -1, although it resets to 2 every time I reboot). It looks
Oh geeze it was just a difficult-to-spot difference in the path! I am using
this tutorial:
https://www.gem5.org/documentation/gem5art/tutorials/spec-tutorial
Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:07 PM Hoa Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Reiko,
>
> Can you point to the tutorial and the launch experiment script
Hi all,
I am trying to keep track of the size of the stack and heap while executing a
binary, and at the moment, I can get the address of the stack pointer using
this line of code
cpu->readArchIntReg(ArmISA::INTREG_SP ,tid).
I am also trying to read the frame pointer (FP), but I am having trou
Hi Xihui,
The error is "died with "
I would guess you're out of memory or trying to compile too many files at
once. But, it could be many different problems. If it's an issue with
dependencies or your host, you can always use our docker images:
https://www.gem5.org/documentation/general_docs/buil
Hi Giacomo,
Thanks for your reply.
Is there any reason for implementing it in full system simulation only?
Can we implement it in SE mode?
Best regards.
On Thursday, September 23, 2021, 11:04:42 AM GMT+3, Giacomo Travaglini via
gem5-users wrote:
Hi
It has been fixed for full-system sim
Hi,
Arthur's answer still stands. As he said, sim_freq is the time resolution of
the simulator itself. It defines the points in time where you are 'allowed' to
schedule events. By default, you can schedule an event every 1e-12 second of
simulated time (1THz). That does not mean all components i
I just saw you sent a fix to gem5 repo and there is a new minor version that
should solve this problem. I'll try it out. Thanks.
Pedro.
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
%(web_pa
Hi Meng,
Did you found a solution to this problem? Rollback the code to the previous
version?
I have the same weird behavior on my stats.txt with gem5 version 21.1.0.0.
Best,
Pedro.
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe se
Hi
It has been fixed for full-system simulation (the patch you are referring to is
providing visibility of the PMU to the linux kernel),
But the syscall in SE mode is still un-implemented.
Kind Regards
Giacomo
> -Original Message-
> From: walt_90--- via gem5-users
> Sent: 22 Septembe
Hi Jason,
Thanks for your help.
But there are lots of errors in the first time to build gem5.
scons: *** [build/X86/mem/ruby/protocol/DMA_Controller.py.cc]
CalledProcessError : Command '['/home/xihui/下载/gem5/build/X86/marshal',
'build/X86/mem/ruby/protocol/DMA_Controller.py']' died with .
Are you talking about Ruby, Garnet and the like? It is perfectly available in
the link I gave to you. git clone will provide you with gem5 v.21.1.0.2, the
very latest stable release as of today. There is no "special" public version of
gem5 I am aware of, anyway.
The commands I gave to you are,
19 matches
Mail list logo