*Very* superficially looking at this (just at what's in the emails here),
you might want to make sure the BaseCPU destructor is virtual, or at least
the destructor of a base class is. If it isn't currently, the destructor of
SimObject should probably be virtual. I don't know for sure whether that
Hi Scott,
I think the answer is the same as the prior email. You need to register an
exit callback to close the file stream :). See, for instance, the elastic
trace code:
https://gem5.googlesource.com/public/gem5/+/refs/heads/stable/src/cpu/o3/probe/elastic_trace.cc#103
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed,
Hi Scott,
If you want something to execute before gem5 is completed, you can call
`registerExitCallback`. See
http://doxygen.gem5.org/release/current/namespacegem5.html#abcf3056836ee522620e5b14d9392ea87
I *think* that will solve your problem, but let me know if not. I don't
think there's a clean
Hello all,
Has anyone used the findOrCreate Gem5 function for opening custom file streams?
For example in src/cpu/base.cc we see that this function is used in the
constructor for BaseCPU
const std::string fname = csprintf("ftrace.%s", name());
functionTraceStream =
Hello,
In src/cpu/base.cc we have the following destructor:
BaseCPU::~BaseCPU()
{
}
By default nothing is inside of it. However, when I put code inside, it does
not seem to be executed at any point. Based on some previous threads I have
seen on the forums, it seems that the destructor for
Hi,
I'm running a multi-threaded application using pthreads + m5threads using SE
mode. I see that as the simulation progresses, the memory consumption keeps
increasing for the process until it gets killed. the process map shows that the
address space is getting filled up with the application's
