Re: [gem5-users] McPAT + Gem5

2017-09-27 Thread Jackie Chan
The following link can help you: http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~ljohn/teaching/382m-15/assignments/assignment4.pdf On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 3:46 AM, F. A. Faisal wrote: > Dear All, > > I would like to configure the McPat xml file for obtaining the benchmark > power analysis

[gem5-users] Issue in dual mode for x86

2017-09-27 Thread Jackie Chan
Hi, everyone! I am trying to run gem5 in dual mode for x86. I ran an apache benchmark (both client and server sides) successfully in atomic mode. But, when I try to run the benchmark in detailed mode, the test system (server side) fails after loading e1000 network driver showing the following

Re: [gem5-users] Linux Kernel v. 3.7 for x86

2017-09-21 Thread Jackie Chan
as tested with 4.8.13. Have you tried a 4.8 or later kernel? > > Otherwise, I would suggest using debug flags/gdb to try to track down the > problem. > > Jason > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:19 PM Jackie Chan <chanjackie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Jason

Re: [gem5-users] Linux Kernel v. 3.7 for x86

2017-09-20 Thread Jackie Chan
ce.com/public/gem5/+/a517b4a6fba2674cb2a5b5b50a187473aedd4362. It's > committed in the current mainline. > > Jason > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:55 AM Jackie Chan <chanjackie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I have been able to run a x86 linux kernel version 3.4 compi

[gem5-users] Linux Kernel v. 3.7 for x86

2017-09-20 Thread Jackie Chan
Hello I have been able to run a x86 linux kernel version 3.4 compiled by me on gem5. When I try to use 3.7 kernel, I am seeing following error: panic: Invalid IDE control register offset: 0 To compile kernel version 3.7, I used same config file as was used for 3.4. I wonder if anyone else has

[gem5-users] Data_Cache

2017-09-08 Thread Jackie Chan
Hey guys! I'm running a small program on gem5 to test data cache. The cache size is 32kB (assoc: 8 and block size: 64 bytes). The program loads independent data values from an array with an offset of 64 bytes (the cache block size), such that the total size of array is 32kB, and the accesses keep