Re: [gem5-users] Stream benchmark mismatch stats

2020-02-21 Thread Majid Jalili
My bad, I was missing a simple point. There are also 5K writes, meaning there would be additional 5K read from main memory to obtain an exclusive copy of the blocks before write (15K/8=1875). So, the simulator is fairly accurate. For different RPs, during initialization some blocks are kept in the

Re: [gem5-users] Stream benchmark mismatch stats

2020-02-20 Thread Jason Lowe-Power
Hi Majid, Are you taking into account the instruction fetches? Cheers, Jason On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:53 AM Majid Jalili wrote: > Let me correct myself. If I set the Size to 5K, then there would be total > of 10K loads (for a[i] and b[i]), so i expect to see 10K/8=1250. > > On Thu, Feb 20,

Re: [gem5-users] Stream benchmark mismatch stats

2020-02-20 Thread Majid Jalili
Let me correct myself. If I set the Size to 5K, then there would be total of 10K loads (for a[i] and b[i]), so i expect to see 10K/8=1250. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:45 AM Majid Jalili wrote: > I am running a simple stream benchmark that does a simple addition: > m5_reset_stats(0,0); >

[gem5-users] Stream benchmark mismatch stats

2020-02-20 Thread Majid Jalili
I am running a simple stream benchmark that does a simple addition: m5_reset_stats(0,0); for(int i = 0 ; i ___ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users