Re: [gem5-users] scons build error for Garnet 2.0

2016-10-19 Thread F. A. Faisal
ynth_traffic.py", line 88, in execfile(os.path.join(config_root, "common", "Options.py")) File "/home1/gem5/configs/common/Options.py", line 46, in import CpuConfig ImportError: No module named CpuConfig Thanks and best regards, F. A. Faisal O

Re: [gem5-users] scons build error for Garnet 2.0

2016-10-19 Thread F. A. Faisal
ll the imports in the Options.py file (Benchmarks, CpuConfig, … ) > need to be updated to commons.* … > > > > On Oct 20, 2016, at 1:00 AM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Jieming, > > Please upload a stable gem5 version. > I am also looking f

[gem5-users] scons build error for Garnet 2.0

2016-10-15 Thread F. A. Faisal
, F. A. Faisal ___ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Re: [gem5-users] scons build error for Garnet 2.0

2016-10-15 Thread F. A. Faisal
com> wrote: > C++ version ? > > Thanks > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:01 PM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> I found the below errors while compiling through scons for latest gem5 >> integrated with garnet 2.0 (hg

Re: [gem5-users] scons build error for Garnet 2.0

2016-10-18 Thread F. A. Faisal
users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> > Date: Monday, 17 October 2016 at 08:54 > > To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org> > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] scons build error for Garnet 2.0 > > Just use clang (i.e. the default OSX compiler). > > Andreas >

Re: [gem5-users] scons build error for Garnet 2.0

2016-10-15 Thread F. A. Faisal
at 10:06 PM, Abdul Mutaal <abdul.mut...@gmail.com> wrote: > Try with >=4.5 > > On Oct 15, 2016 2:56 PM, "F. A. Faisal" <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> $ g++ -v >> >> Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Develop

[gem5-users] Hierarchical Networks on Garnet 2.0

2017-04-07 Thread F. A. Faisal
Dear All, I am currently working with the various traffic analyses for Garnet 2.0. My main focus is on the variable linked hierarchical networks at the various network levels. Hence, different on-chip nodes are interconnected with the different on-chip network (

[gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Invariable Injection Rate for Different Vnets

2017-07-28 Thread F. A. Faisal
of Different Vnets for reducing this conjection or can I distribute the flits evenly between all the vnets to make sure the network is not in deadlock. I will appreciate your earliest reply. Thanks and best regards, F. A. Faisal ___ gem5-users mailing list

Re: [gem5-users] Need Linux Kernel with 256 core for X86

2017-07-17 Thread F. A. Faisal
t think gem5 supports more than 256 cores (and maybe not that >> many) without making code modifications. I believe there are a few places >> where we use a core bitvector, and I doubt it's bigger than 64-bits. >> >> Jason >> >> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:03 AM

[gem5-users] Need Linux Kernel with 256 core for X86

2017-07-14 Thread F. A. Faisal
t; (USED GIT Repository, Download- 28/06/2017) Thanks in advance. Best regards, F. A. Faisal ___ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Torus is being Deadlocked for 256 nodes with injection rate = 0.14

2017-07-25 Thread F. A. Faisal
vc is odd then choose the odd VC only... if (is_vc_idle(vc, m_router->curCycle())) { m_outvc_state[vc]->setState(ACTIVE_, m_router->curCycle()); return vc; } } } } return -1; } Thanks again

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Torus is being Deadlocked for 256 nodes with injection rate = 0.14

2017-07-24 Thread F. A. Faisal
for all the users of garnet 2,0. I would like to solve this. Thanks again. Faisal On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:21 PM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks a lot for reply. > > This is little bit terrible news for me. > > However, as far I know garnet1.0 don't ha

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Torus is being Deadlocked for 256 nodes with injection rate = 0.14

2017-07-24 Thread F. A. Faisal
itioning scheme or bubble flow control. That's why I > removed torus from the default topologies provided by garnet2.0. If you > implement torus, you will have to implement deadlock freedom. > > Cheers, > Tushar > > > On Jul , 2017, at 5:56 PM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Torus is being Deadlocked for 256 nodes with injection rate = 0.14

2017-07-27 Thread F. A. Faisal
ID (May not be destination router ID) which is connected with the output port of the current router. Thanks a lot again. Thanks and best regards, F.A. Faisal On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:30 PM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Professor, > > Thanks for the

[gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Torus is being Deadlocked for 256 nodes with injection rate = 0.14

2017-07-24 Thread F. A. Faisal
Dear All, I like to simulate the synthetic traffic analysis for Torus for 256 nodes with uniform traffic. However, the network is showing latency degradation after 0.14 injection rate (flit latency = 33.044985 for 0.14 and flit latency = 38.244770 for 0.13 ), which could be the possible case of

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Invariable Injection Rate for Different Vnets

2017-07-28 Thread F. A. Faisal
of the next node and its outport VC. This is a very important issue for garnet. Please help me. Thanks and regards, F. A. Faisal On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Krishna, Tushar <tus...@ece.gatech.edu> wrote: > Hi Faisal, > I would try testing the design with one vnet (

[gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

2017-05-03 Thread F. A. Faisal
--num-l2caches=4 --topology=Mesh --mesh-rows=2 --garnet=fixed --kernel=vmlinux_2.6.27-gcc_4.3.4 --script=scripts/runparsec1.rcS Thanks in advance. F. A. Faisal ___ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5

[gem5-users] Parsec 2.1 + Garnet 2.0: Too Slow!!!

2017-06-21 Thread F. A. Faisal
=/home1/faisal/gem5/system/alpha/m5_system_2.0b3/disks/linux-parsec-2-1-m5.img Thanks in advance... Best regards, F. A. Faisal ___ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Re: [gem5-users] Parsec 2.1 + Garnet 2.0: Too Slow!!!

2017-06-22 Thread F. A. Faisal
ffc3111e8 fc003f05fd40 fc003f05fce8 fc821760 Trace: [] watchdog+0x2b8/0x320 [] kthread+0x7c/0xd0 [] watchdog+0x0/0x320 [] kthread+0x0/0xd0 [] kernel_thread+0x10/0x90 [] kernel_thread+0x28/0x90 Thanks in advance. F. A. Faisal On Wed, Jun 2

Re: [gem5-users] Parsec 2.1 + Garnet 2.0: Too Slow!!!

2017-06-25 Thread F. A. Faisal
aries" and nothing after that. In case of parsec 2.1 (other than blackscholes), all the giving the "INFO: task vips:894 blocked for more than 120 seconds" and running for long long time and can't getting out of loop. Please help me. Thanks in advance. F. A. Faisal On Fri, Jun 23

[gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Average Network Latency is missing!!!

2017-05-24 Thread F. A. Faisal
1.0 average latency (40.403994) for 8x8 mesh with same configuration as referenced paper of garnet, which is completely different. Please let me know how to validate garnet 2.0 as of garnet 1.0. Thanks in advance. Best regards, F. A. Faisal ___ gem5

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0: Average Network Latency is missing!!!

2017-05-26 Thread F. A. Faisal
ration to be done to obtain the referenced paper result. ./build/ALPHA_Network_test/gem5.debug configs/example/ruby_network_test.py --num-cpus=64 --num-dirs=64 --topology=Mesh --mesh-rows=8 --sim-cycles=1 --injectionrate=0.15 --synthetic=0 --garnet-network=fixed Thanks and best regards, F. A.

Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

2017-05-08 Thread F. A. Faisal
tic. > > Try with other coherence protocols perhaps ... > > Cheers, > Tushar > > On May 5, 2017, at 2:21 PM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I tried simple network option. However, the result is the same. Please let > me know, if I am missing any

Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

2017-05-05 Thread F. A. Faisal
LIBC BACKTRACE --- Aborted (core dumped) Best regards, F. A. Faisal On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Krishna, Tushar <tus...@ece.gatech.edu> wrote: > Hi Faisal, > You can still add --topology with the fs.py file. > You n

Re: [gem5-users] FS simulation with Garnet 2.0

2017-05-05 Thread F. A. Faisal
system.ruby.dma_cntrl0 time: 4722258003 addr: 523845696 event: WriteRequest state: BUSY_WR @ tick 2361129001500 [doTransitionWorker:build/ALPHA/mem/protocol/DMA_Transitions.cc, line 135] Memory Usage: 1015648 KBytes Thanks a lot. F. A. Faisal On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Krishna, Tushar <

Re: [gem5-users] fatal: _pid

2017-05-05 Thread F. A. Faisal
try below link- http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=0bf388858d1e and download bz2 file... I just tried garnet 2.0 now. Thanks, F. A. Faisal On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:35 AM, raziye deylamsalehi < raziye.deylamsal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I updated gem5 today.I cou

[gem5-users] Application Mappings on virtual CPU core

2017-09-05 Thread F. A. Faisal
Dear All, I like to know how the CPU core has been assigned in case of Splash-2 or Parsec Benchmark suits. Is there any random or other considerations. I consider the FS mode. Can I replace the current core application mapping in various applications in gem5. Thanks a lot. Best regards, F

[gem5-users] NAS Parallel Benhmarks on gem5

2017-09-07 Thread F. A. Faisal
Dear All, I would like to run the NAS benchmarks suite on gem5. If anyone has any idea, how to configure the gem5 system for NAS benchmarks, Please share the same. I would like to run the gem5 with FS mode and the Alpha ISA. Thanks in advance. Best regards, F. A. Faisal

Re: [gem5-users] Garnet 2.0 + How the dir_nodes are connected in Mesh_XY network

2017-09-07 Thread F. A. Faisal
l i need to make different port name for each router. ROTUER_0 --> (outport) 0 -> 1 (inport) Router_1 ROTUER_0 --> (outport) 0 -> 2 (inport) Router_1 ROTUER_0 --> (outport) 0 -> 3 (inport) Router_1 Thanks again. Best Regards, F. A. Faisal On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:44 PM

[gem5-users] McPAT + Gem5

2017-09-24 Thread F. A. Faisal
the xml file from the current stats files or I would like to know how I can find the value/results of the attached parameters or stats from the gem5 stats or ini or json file. Thanks a lot. Best regards, F. A. Faisal

[gem5-users] Garnet 2.0 + How the dir_nodes are connected in Mesh_XY network

2017-08-31 Thread F. A. Faisal
to transmit a complete packet between the two interconnected routers. 4. And is it possible to make the packet level tracing in Garnet 2.0. Please let me know the details to increase the understanding. Thanks a lot in advance for your kind help. Best regards, F. A. Faisal

[gem5-users] How to change the number of data message flits size + garnet

2018-06-15 Thread F. A. Faisal
flits. [In addition, I am also unsure about changing ni_flit_size to any value, can change the actual number of flit size in data packets or the control packets] Please let me know the possible configuration to perform such changes. Thanks in advance for your kindness. Thanks and best regards, F

Re: [gem5-users] Script to convert Gem5 output to McPAT

2018-02-15 Thread F. A. Faisal
Mob: 080-3048-7558 On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:59 PM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Andreas, > > Thanks a lot for your scripts on mcpat. > However, I had tried to convert my stats file and config file to a new xml > file using the GEM5ToMcPAT.py scri

Re: [gem5-users] Integration of GEM5 with Garnet and Orion2.0

2014-06-24 Thread F. A. Faisal via gem5-users
me out. Best Regards, Faisal On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:50 PM, F. A. Faisal dipu.7...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I build the system as you mentioned and run the below command but still I am unable to extract any power consumption analysis for GEM5

[gem5-users] Integration of GEM5 and Topaz

2014-06-26 Thread F. A. Faisal via gem5-users
Dears, Topaz interconnection network simulator is integrated with GEM5. But after running the simulation with Topaz, I found no power consumption analysis for any simulation.So is it possible to get the power analysis by using the Topaz with GEM5 like similar to the garnet and orion2.0. I found