Re: [gem5-users] Terminating multi-core simulation

2018-05-29 Thread Muhammad Avais
Dear Haeyoon, Many thanks for your help and guidance. I will try to apply first scheme suggested by you in previous email. Best Regards, Avais On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:18 PM, 조해윤 wrote: > Dear Avais, > > I think it is reasonable to normalize with the numbers of executed >

Re: [gem5-users] Terminating multi-core simulation

2018-05-27 Thread 조해윤
Dear Avais, I think it is reasonable to normalize with the numbers of executed instructions, but it still is a weakness that the running sections of benchmarks are not same totally. In my case, it was my best to exit the simulation by the total numbers of executed instructions. But if you can

Re: [gem5-users] Terminating multi-core simulation

2018-05-24 Thread Muhammad Avais
Dear Haeyoon Cho., I am really thankful to you for this help. Actually, i am not very good in modifying gem5 and this code will be very helpful for me. I have one more question, is it good idea to normalize the stats with number of instructions simulated to calculate energy or other things? Does

Re: [gem5-users] Terminating multi-core simulation

2018-05-24 Thread 조해윤
Dear Avais, I think running workloads fairly is very important in multi-core experiments, because the number of executed instructions of each core can be changed depend on each experimental configuration. There is a prior work how to experiment fairly on multi-core system; A. Hilton et al.,