RE: [rddp] Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC reviews: rddp security andapplicability

2006-04-25 Thread Jim Pinkerton
Thanks for the feedback Joel. Comments in-line. Jim -Original Message- From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 6:10 PM To: Mary Barnes; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; rddp@ietf.org Subject: [rddp] Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC reviews: rddp

RE: [rddp] Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC reviews: rddp security andapplicability

2006-04-25 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Thank you. The changes you propose would address the minor issues. Yours, Joel At 10:31 AM 4/25/2006, Jim Pinkerton wrote: Thanks for the feedback Joel. Comments in-line. Jim ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

[Gen-art] review of draft-kornijenko-ivis-urn-00.txt

2006-04-25 Thread Francis Dupont
Summary: basically ready with nits I strongly recommend to convert the document to a tool like xml2rfc before to send it to the RFC editor! Other concerns: - the document should specify which kind of namespace registration is asked for (I've assume formal) - so there must be an IANA

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09

2006-04-25 Thread Ron Bonica
Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html. Document: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09.txt Comments: The