Title: Review draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery-04.txt
I'm doing this review since Francis is currently on vacation and had previously done a review of the -03, finding only nits.
Document: draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery-04.txt
Reviewer: Mary Barnes (for Francis
Not to worry. I will trust my fellow ADs on this one.
Brian
Michael A. Patton wrote:
I've been having a number of computer and connectivity problems
recently. This means that my normal load of paying work is taking
longer and I won't have any time this week to review the document I
was
I noticed that Brian has already issued his ballot on this, but I had
written-up
some rough comments on this, so I'm sending them for completeness sake.
These are mostly nits, but I generally have to say that overall, the
document
doesn't seem very readable.
1) Contributor section at the
no-objection
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
In your previous mail you wrote:
As you suggested, I did contact the IESG, specifically the Security
ADs, about IKEv1 vs. IKEv2, and the verdict is to stick with IKEv1 as
profiled by RFC 3723 for iSCSI so that iSCSI and RDDP use the same
profile of IPsec. If/when RFC 3723 is
Hi all,
Here's this week's LC assignments along with one Early Review
assignment:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html
Thanks,
Mary.
---
Reviewer: David Black
- 'End-to-middle Security
