Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC review: draft-funk-eap-ttls-v0-04.txt

2008-03-21 Thread Joel M. Halpern
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: EAP Tunneled TLS

Re: [Gen-art] Assignment: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-eval-05.txt

2008-03-21 Thread Joel M. Halpern
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-05

2008-03-21 Thread Elwyn Davies
Most of this seems fine. See few remaining points in line. I gather I didn't respond sufficiently rapidly, and you have published a new version. The points could be dealt with by RFC Editor notes if your AD considers t appropriate. /Elwyn Ghyslain Pelletier wrote: > Thanks you for your carefu

[Gen-art] Reminder on re-reviews for LC docs that have been up-versioned: Assignments for 27 March 2008

2008-03-21 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi folks, I've been asked the question more than once as to why the review for a doc which was reviewed at LC time and deemed ready isn't carried over for the telechat. In the case where the same version of the document was reviewed at LC time, I do keep that review for the telechat. However, if a

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfsdirect-07.txt

2008-03-21 Thread Francis Dupont
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4