Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Joel M. Halpern
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Probably the simplest solution for the first part of the major problem is to add text at the front of the rules section (section 2), that states something like: The rules about character properties given here are additional restrictions on what characters are permitted in specific DNS labels,

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Harald Alvestrand
Joel M. Halpern wrote: Probably the simplest solution for the first part of the major problem is to add text at the front of the rules section (section 2), that states something like: The rules about character properties given here are additional restrictions on what characters are permitted

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Vint Cerf
thanks Joel - we will work on resolving these matters - as you see some of the editors have already engaged. v On Oct 5, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-08.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Suresh Krishnan
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-08.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Shouichi.Sakane
Hi Brian, I got your double comment, but I had made a response it on 8th Aug. I attached my response below in case. Regards, Shoichi Sakane From: Sakane, Shouichi (shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:50 PM To: Brian E

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Shoichi, I am sorry, I have checked my email and can find no record of receiving your message of 8th August. Perhaps I made a mistake, or perhaps the network made a mistake! Some comments in line... On 2009-10-06 11:47, shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com wrote: Hi Brian, I got your double

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Brian, I got your double comment, but I had made a response it on 8th Aug. I attached my response below in case. Regards, Shoichi Sakane From: Sakane, Shouichi (shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:50 PM To: Brian E

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

2009-10-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Shoichi, I am sorry, I have checked my email and can find no record of receiving your message of 8th August. Perhaps I made a mistake, or perhaps the network made a mistake! Some comments in line... On 2009-10-06 11:47, shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com wrote: Hi Brian, I got your double