Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi Shoichi, I am sorry, I have checked my email and can find no record of receiving your message of 8th August. Perhaps I made a mistake, or perhaps the network made a mistake! Some comments in line... On 2009-10-06 11:47, shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I got your double

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi Brian, I got your double comment, but I had made a response it on 8th Aug. I attached my response below in case. Regards, Shoichi Sakane From: Sakane, Shouichi (shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:50 PM To: Brian E Carp

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi Shoichi, I am sorry, I have checked my email and can find no record of receiving your message of 8th August. Perhaps I made a mistake, or perhaps the network made a mistake! Some comments in line... On 2009-10-06 11:47, shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I got your double

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi Brian, I got your double comment, but I had made a response it on 8th Aug. I attached my response below in case. Regards, Shoichi Sakane From: Sakane, Shouichi (shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:50 PM To: Brian E Carp

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-sha2-dsa-ecdsa-08

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pkix

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-08.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-08.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

thanks Joel - we will work on resolving these matters - as you see some of the editors have already engaged. v On Oct 5, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see htt

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

Joel M. Halpern wrote: Probably the simplest solution for the first part of the "major" problem is to add text at the front of the rules section (section 2), that states something like: The rules about character properties given here are additional restrictions on what characters are permitted

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

Probably the simplest solution for the first part of the "major" problem is to add text at the front of the rules section (section 2), that states something like: The rules about character properties given here are additional restrictions on what characters are permitted in specific DNS labels,

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

Joel, Speaking for myself only... It may or may not have been wise for the Gen-ART group to parcel this documents out to different reviewers. On the one hand, it reduces the burden but, on the other, they are closely related and, without seeing the relationship, confusion is not only possible bu

Re: [Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-idna