Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20120810
IETF LC End Date: 20120813
IESG Telechat date: unknown
Summary: Ready
Major issues: None
Minor issues:
- a very minor question: why in the search syntax is there no NOT operator,
only AND and OR?
- annoying edition bug in 2.6
Nits/editorial
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-dpm-06.txt
Reviewer:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ospf-hybrid-bcast-and-p2mp-04
Ben,
Thanks for your review.
The right status isn't clear-cut (I think), but when we (Chairs Wes)
discussed it, Info seemed best
* mainly because precedent seems to be that API docs are informational, for
example socket API extensions for SCTP http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6458/
*
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-05.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc5787bis-05.
On Aug 13, 2012, at 9:14 AM, philip.eard...@bt.com wrote:
Ben,
Thanks for your review.
The right status isn't clear-cut (I think), but when we (Chairs Wes)
discussed it, Info seemed best
* mainly because precedent seems to be that API docs are informational, for
example socket API
Martin,
Thank you very much for this review - you found a number of things
that need attention, but there are also a few comments that
(probably unbeknownst to you) represent design decisions that
cannot be revisited courtesy of the amount of deployed iSCSI
running code.
Responses are inline
David,
I think that you successfully covered most of the concerns. I fully
expected there to be a number of decisions that would be immutable for
that reason. I'll look for the update.
--Martin
On 13 August 2012 14:32, Black, David david.bl...@emc.com wrote:
Martin,
Thank you very much for
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-abfab-usecases-03.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Summary: This draft is ready
Thanks Roni,
Good catches.
Adrian
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roni
Even
Sent: 13 August 2012 22:07
To: draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc5787bis@tools.ietf.org
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc5787bis-05
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
