Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01

Thanks Ben, we'll attend to your points. > -- section 5, 2nd paragraph: "Specifically, the specification [ ] states..." > > Is that an intentional Tom Swiftie? :-) No, it's definitely definitive. I had to look up Tom Swiftie Wikipedially. Regards Brian On 01/10/2013 11:28, Ben Campbell wrot

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06

Steve, [1] Terminology: > The term PATHSEC is used to refer to a generic path security solution > approach, consistent with the WG charter, rather than to the specific > solution approach, BGPsec, that has been developed. The rationale for > using the different term is that this threat doc should

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-01

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancin

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-27

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops Reviewer: Ro

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06

David, Major issue: This draft contains more than just a threat model. agreed. It also contains a high level security analysis of the security architecture/approach that applies the RPKI to secure use of BGP. yes. we didn't create a threat model doc for the RPKI, and this seemed like a goo

Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-11

Hi Daniele, Your suggested actions to address my issues look good. Thanks! Regards, Christer From: Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: Monday, 30 September 2013 5:01 PM To: Christer Holmberg; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model@tools.

Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-11

Hi Christer, Thanks for the rewiew. v12 of the drafts should solve your comments. General: --- Q_G_1: The document says "ITU-T recommendation G.XXX", "ITU-T G.XXX", and "G.XXX". Please use consistent terminology. Authors> ITU-T recommendation G.XXX used o

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-p2psip-drr-10.txt

viewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20130927 IETF LC End Date: 20130930 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: the title and the abstract must get an explicit expansion of the RELOAD acronym, e.g., the title shoud be: An extension to REsource LOcati

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication-02.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication-02

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-10 Reviewer: Dan

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-10 Reviewer: Dan

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

Hi Jari, Sorry for late response, I have been on vacation all last week and now catching up. My concern was with the IANA registry which looks OK in version 13 of the draft Roni > -Original Message- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net] > Sent: 26 September, 2013 1:54 PM > To: R