Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06

David, Thanks a lot for your detailed review and comments. Here are the details of responses. I have also attached the updated document. Major issues: [1] Operational considerations: There appears to be more than enough enabled by this draft to wreak serious operational havoc,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-01

Hello Dan, Thank you very much for your review! My comments are in-line. * "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" > 1. In the second paragraph of the Introduction I suggest s/The > Explicit Address Mapping Table does not replace/Translation using the > Explicit Address Mapping Table

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06 - Editorial comments and nits

Most of the nits/editorial comments are fine. Two follow-ups: > -- 3.1. TLV format > >Type : TBA, Suggested value 10 > > Please add an RFC Editor Note asking the RFC Editor to replace this with the > actual IANA-assigned value. > Does the RFC Editor Note go as part of this document.

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06: A-D issues

David> Inline. I'll deal with the A-D issues here and the editorial David> items/nits in a separate message. > David, > > Thanks a lot for your detailed review and comments. > [... snip ...] > --- Minor issues: > > -- 3.2 Elements of procedure: > > [A] I see what look like some