Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09

Donald, >> For cases of "[RFC5310] Based authentication" to "[RFC5310]-based >> authentication". Watch for one instance of "RFC 5310 Based" as well. >OK. >(Nit-Nit: I think in the nit above, the first word should be Four.) Ha! (I hadn't actually counted the number of cases. ) >> Page 12,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09

Hi Peter, Thanks for your thorough review. See below. On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Peter Yee wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for > the IETF Chair.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-ia-appsubtlv [RESEND]

[Resending in case it wasn't received, since I have received no replies.] I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01

Hi Vijay, I appreciate the review and comment. > That is, are the schemes (urn, eidr) part of the case-insensitive string > match? Yes, it looks like "Lexical equivalence of EIDR-URN is defined by case-insensitive string match." should say "Lexical equivalence of URN-EIDR is defined by

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comment. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at