If that's what you mean, let me suggest simplifying:
OLD
At least one priority
level MUST be advertised that, unless overridden by local policy,
SHALL be at priority level 0.
NEW
At least one
Hi Russ
Thank you for the review.
I would like to respond to one point:
Notes:
I see that draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-protection the
earlier
Internet-Draft file name for this document. An IPR declaration was
issued against that earlier name. The shepherd write-up indicates
that
Hi Pete,
This is an “inheritance” from GMPLS, where supporting a single priority equals
not supporting priorities. If you don’t want to support priorities you don’t
want your traffic to be preempted…hence priority 0.
>Well, it doesn't say that shouldn't be done, but it probably doesn't need
