Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-09

2018-02-23 Thread Huaimo Chen
Hi Stewart, Thank you very much for your comments. Answers to your comments are inline below with prefix [HC]. Would you mind reviewing them to see if they address the issues? Best Regards, Huaimo -Original Message- From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com]

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-14

2018-02-23 Thread Peter Yee
Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09

2018-02-23 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Qin, see in line: On 24/02/2018 04:16, Qin Wang wrote: > Hi Brian, > Thank you very much for your comments. Please see inline. > > On Monday, February 19, 2018 6:22 PM, Brian Carpenter > wrote: > > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready with Issues

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-15

2018-02-23 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Dear Authors, Now that Last Call for this draft has ended, could you folks take a look at Dale's comments and respond? Thanks! Spencer, as responsible AD On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Dale Worley wrote: > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib-12

2018-02-23 Thread Meral Shirazipour
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09

2018-02-23 Thread Qin Wang
Hi Brian, Thank you very much for your comments. Please see inline. On Monday, February 19, 2018 6:22 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote: Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready with Issues Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 I am

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-object-security-08

2018-02-23 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Yes, that is what I was looking for. Thank you, Joel On 2/23/18 9:38 AM, Göran Selander wrote: How about this (see the last and third to last edit): https://github.com/core-wg/oscoap/commit/8f277d83 where the reference is made to COSE instead of AEAD? Best Göran On 2018-02-23 15:32, "Joel

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-object-security-08

2018-02-23 Thread Göran Selander
How about this (see the last and third to last edit): https://github.com/core-wg/oscoap/commit/8f277d83 where the reference is made to COSE instead of AEAD? Best Göran On 2018-02-23 15:32, "Joel Halpern Direct" wrote: >I guess it is up to you. Personally, I like

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-object-security-08

2018-02-23 Thread Joel Halpern Direct
I guess it is up to you. Personally, I like the idea of the verify description including some reference to how one actually does verify. I will leave it to the authors and WG to decide what degree of clarity is called for here. Yours, Joel On 2/23/18 9:30 AM, Göran Selander wrote: Hi Joel,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-object-security-08

2018-02-23 Thread Göran Selander
Hi Joel, Thanks for quick feedback, inline. On 2018-02-23 14:59, "Joel M. Halpern" wrote: >In terms of my concerns, if Step 7 said "Verify and Decrypt the COSE >object using the Recipient Key as per RFC 5116 Section 2.2" that would >fill in the confusion for this reader.

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-object-security-08

2018-02-23 Thread Joel M. Halpern
In terms of my concerns, if Step 7 said "Verify and Decrypt the COSE object using the Recipient Key as per RFC 5116 Section 2.2" that would fill in the confusion for this reader. Yours, Joel On 2/23/18 5:26 AM, Göran Selander wrote: Hi Joel, Thanks for your review. Comments inline. On

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-object-security-08

2018-02-23 Thread Göran Selander
Hi Joel, Thanks for your review. Comments inline. On 2018-02-22 04:51, "Joel Halpern" wrote: >Reviewer: Joel Halpern >Review result: Ready with Nits > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents