Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-04

2020-01-29 Thread Ines Robles
Hi Roland, Thank you for addressing my comments. I agree with them. Best, Ines. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:50 AM wrote: > Hi Ines, > Thank you for your review. > I have incoperated your comments within the draft. > > On Question 1 In Section 1 I have changed the last paragraph by adding the

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06

2020-01-29 Thread Chuck Lever
OK. The next submitted revision will include changes resulting from the Gen-ART review. I'm waiting for resolution of SecDir comments before submitting a fresh revision. Meanwhile, the changes so far are available to view as a diff with -06: https://chucklever.github.io/i-d-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data/#g

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06

2020-01-29 Thread Suhas Nandakumar
Thanks Chuck for the additional clarification. That helped me to understand better. Sorry that I missed it in my reading. Yes the suggested changes look great. Cheers Suhas On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:23 AM Chuck Lever wrote: > > > On Jan 29, 2020, at 12:03 AM, Suhas Nandakumar > wrote: > > >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06

2020-01-29 Thread Chuck Lever
> On Jan 29, 2020, at 12:03 AM, Suhas Nandakumar wrote: > > Thanks Chuck for the response. Please see inline > >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:52 AM Chuck Lever wrote: >> >> Zero is a permitted value for the size fields. Section 5.2 explains how >> to compute the actual buffer size. If those fi