Hi Russ,
Thank you very much for addressing my comments promptly. I am ok with your
proposals.
BR,
Ines
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:27 PM Russ Housley wrote:
> Ines Robles:
>
> Thank you for the careful review and comments.
>
> > Nits/Comments:
> >
> > 1- Introduction: "however, these
Ines Robles:
Thank you for the careful review and comments.
> Nits/Comments:
>
> 1- Introduction: "however, these algorithms are no longer
> considered the best choices. " => It would be nice to add 1 or more
> sentences explaining why they are no longer the best choices
I suggest:
Thanks Pete for the review i have addressed the nits, including the abundance
of MUSTs :) and will release in a next version 08 include other review comments.
-Chris
> On Mar 15, 2021, at 4:06 PM, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hello Elwyn,
Thank you for you review. I have fixed the nit you pointed out in the new
version of the draft (-14).
/Ludwig
> -Original Message-
> From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
> Sent: den 23 mars 2021 23:53
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: a...@ietf.org;
