Dale,
Thanks for the review. Version -05 should address these:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku/
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku-04=draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku-05=--html
spt
> On Aug 7, 2022, at 15:45, Dale
On Aug 20, 2022, at 8:23 PM, Laurence Lundblade wrote:
>
> I don’t know anything about router architecture, but do about mobile phone
> architecture which I consider a candidate for composite attestation.
>
> A mobile phone based on a chip like a Qualcomm Snapdragon has many
> subsystems.
Dmitry and James,
I think several different issues are getting intertwined here,
some of which rise to the level of principles. It is clear that
we are making different assumptions about what is relevant and
important and almost as clear that we are not going to convince
each other. As I said
Laurence Lundblade wrote:
>> Yes, the way in which the Evidence is relayed is vendor proprietary,
>> but the the Evidence and/or Attestation Results are then relayed to an
>> external verifier.
> I don’t know anything about router architecture, but do about mobile
> phone
