[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-update-05

Reviewer: Ines Robles Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-06

Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07

Richards, Thanks for the explanation. The third paragraph of the Intro section says: The Secure Real-Time Protocol (SRTP) is already widely used for HBH encryption [RFC3711]. The SRTP "double encryption" scheme defines a way to do E2E encryption in SRTP [RFC8723]. Unfortunately, this scheme has

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-05

Looks good! On 4/3/24 11:09 AM, Corey Bonnell wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks again for your careful review. -07 resolves the malformed section reference: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-06=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-07=--html Thanks, Corey -Original

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-05

Hi Paul, Thanks again for your careful review. -07 resolves the malformed section reference: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-06=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-07=--html Thanks, Corey -Original Message- From: Paul Kyzivat Sent: Wednesday, April 3,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-05

Corey, On 4/3/24 8:45 AM, Corey Bonnell wrote: Hello Paul, Thank you for your detailed review and insightful feedback. We have just uploaded -06 to the Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis/. We believe -06 addresses all the concerns that you raised. Please

Re: [Gen-art] [***SPAM***] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-06

Hi Valery, Yes, your proposed text sounds good to me. Thank you again for the updates! Best, Reese___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-05

Hello Paul, Thank you for your detailed review and insightful feedback. We have just uploaded -06 to the Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis/. We believe -06 addresses all the concerns that you raised. Please let us know if there are still unresolved

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07

Hi Linda, Secure Frames are *not* decrypted by the SFU. The outer HBH encryption is decrypted by the SFU, but the point of the E2E encryption is that the SFU does not have the keys. The document does not claim to save on SFU processing. For a switching SFU, the processing should be roughly the

Re: [Gen-art] [***SPAM***] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-06

Hi Reese, I snipped most of the text for readability. > Hi Valery, > > Thank you for the response and updates. > > Please see inline: [...] > >> Section 5: > >> > >> "Note, that this is not a real attack, since NULL authentication > >> should be allowed by local security policy." Why is it