Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-05

Elwyn, Thanks for the review. Note the current draft that is out for IETF last call is draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-07. Comments below. Thanks, Bob > On Jun 20, 2019, at 12:53 AM, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-06

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:26 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > > Hi, Stewart, > > > On 4/24/2017 10:12 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: >> Minor issues: >> >> A node MUST NOT reduce its estimate of the Path MTU below the IPv6 >> minimum link MTU. >> >> SB> I missed this last time. >> SB> >> SB>

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Stewart, Thanks for the detailed review. I am responding after reading the email thread that resulted, some issues were closed. Several of the reviews have suggested significant changes to this document. The working group was trying to make a few changes to bring it into alignment with

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-05

On Nov 29, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Russ, there are changes needed from this and other reviews, and IMHO some of them need to go back to the WG. I wouldn't be comfortable asserting that they are editorial. Personally I'd be happy with Revised I-D Needed, with or without a

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-Art LC Review: draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-flags-option-01.txt

On Aug 20, 2007, at 9:46 AM, ext Brian Haberman wrote: Hi Joel, Thanks for the review. I see no problem with making the suggested change on length handling to clarify behavior. I am in agreement as well. Bob Regards, Brian Joel M. Halpern wrote: I have been selected as the