, 2013 12:14 AM
To: Kent Leung (kleung); gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-requirements@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-12
Hi Kent,
I took a look at version -13, and the only change seems to be that you have
changed [] to {} around the priority level
Hi Christer. OK. I agree it's not a major item. I do have a preference and
appreciate your feedback. Thanks.
Kent
From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 11:13 AM
To: Kent Leung (kleung); gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-requirements
OK. Thanks for the clarification. Appreciate your feedback. :)
Kent
From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 11:58 PM
To: Kent Leung (kleung); gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-requirements@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART review
Hi Christer. Thank you for the review. It's a good point that the language used
to describe the requirement is consistent with the priority level so becomes a
bit redundant. The marking of HIGH/MED/LOW makes the priority of the
requirement explicitly clear. It's easier to identify and browse
