Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

essage- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 8:45 AM > To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com>; Stewart Bryant > <stewart.bry...@gmail.com>; Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; gen-art@ietf

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Ole, > -Original Message- > From: otr...@employees.org [mailto:otr...@employees.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:17 AM > To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> > Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bry...@gmail.com>; Brian E Carpenter > <

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Ole, > -Original Message- > From: otr...@employees.org [mailto:otr...@employees.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:33 AM > To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bry...@gmail.com> > Cc: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com>; Brian E Carpenter > <

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Stewart, > -Original Message- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 8:13 AM > To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com>; Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; Stewart Bryant > &

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

HI Stewart, > -Original Message- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 1:51 AM > To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com>; Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; Stewart Bryant > &

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Ole, > -Original Message- > From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of otr...@employees.org > Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 2:59 PM > To: C. M. Heard > Cc: 6man WG ; IETF ; Gen-ART > ; Suresh Krishnan

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi, about ECMP I think RFC1981bis should be OK even if ECMP is used in the network as long as ICMP PTBs are not blocked. RFC1981bis will eventually converge to the minimum MTU of all paths in the multipath, and so it is still OK to store the MTU in the network layer where it would be shared by all