Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-07

2018-10-19 Thread Uma Chunduri
Hi Elwyn, See in-line [Uma]: Thx! -- Uma C. From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 3:41 PM To: Uma Chunduri ; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; rt...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Genart last call

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-07

2018-10-16 Thread Uma Chunduri
Hi Elwyn, Thanks for your detailed review. Your feedback and suggestions were taken care in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-08 Let us know if this addresses your comments. See my comments in-line [Uma]: -- Uma C. -Original Message- From: Elwyn

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

2017-01-19 Thread Uma Chunduri
Les, I see what you are saying. Quick response in-line [Uma]: -- Uma C. From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:11 PM To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chund...@huawei.com>; John E Drake <jdr...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

2017-01-19 Thread Uma Chunduri
I support advertising this in IGP. >This is clearly not TE information -.. >I do not see the IGPs as the appropriate mechanism to flood generic interface >capabilities We have instances where both the above are not met and we flooded information. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7883 (Les, you

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-06

2015-07-06 Thread Uma Chunduri
Hi Brian, Thank you. As agreed earlier I shall address your last comment (Nit: below) in the next revision (by taking care couple of other comments from Security and OPSEC area). Yes, shall make sure to give heads up to document shepherd and AD before publishing. -- Uma C. -Original

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04

2015-06-29 Thread Uma Chunduri
Hi Brian, Thanks for your review (apologies for the delay from my side). Response i-line [Uma]: -- Uma C. -Original Message- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:37 PM To: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis@ietf.org; General Area

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04

2015-06-29 Thread Uma Chunduri
To: Uma Chunduri; draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis@ietf.org; General Area Review Team Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04 Hi Uma, See below... On 30/06/2015 06:19, Uma Chunduri wrote: Hi Brian, Thanks for your review (apologies for the delay from my side

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04

2015-06-29 Thread Uma Chunduri
. -Original Message- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:37 PM To: Uma Chunduri; draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis@ietf.org; General Area Review Team Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04 That looks fine

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05

2015-04-12 Thread Uma Chunduri
Hi Christer, Thanks for your review and I shall address both comments you made below in the next revision. -- Uma C. From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 5:56 AM To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Gen-art] [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08

2013-08-15 Thread Uma Chunduri
The key table is analogous to the SPD in 4301, but not the PAD. Close to SAD not SPD for some RPs as it have negotiation result including keys. But not definitely analogous to the PAD. -- Uma C. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org