Re: [Gen-art] [Anima] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-09

2022-04-12 Thread Peter van der Stok
Hi Michael, I liked the reference to RFC6550 because it shows that other RFCs provide the same modes; and it was argued to standardize only one mode. Peter Michael Richardson schreef op 2022-04-11 20:04: The document defines a mechanism to assign a Device (Pledge) to a (anima) domain,

Re: [Gen-art] [Anima] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-09

2022-04-11 Thread Michael Richardson
> The document defines a mechanism to assign a Device (Pledge) to a > (anima) domain, represented by a Registrar, using an intermediate node > (e.g. 6LR) called constrained Joint Proxy. Once that the Pledge is > enrolled to the network, it can take the role of a Joint Proxy.

Re: [Gen-art] [Anima] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-09

2022-04-11 Thread Peter van der Stok
Hi Ines, Many thanks for your review. Please see inline comments below. Greetings, Peter Reviewer: Ines Robles Review result: On the Right Track I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG