Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

2020-08-12 Thread Alissa Cooper
Ines, thanks for your review. Michael, Russ, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jul 13, 2020, at 2:52 AM, Ines Robles > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Yes, that would be great, if possible. > > Thank you, > > Ines > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:56 AM

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

2020-07-13 Thread Ines Robles
Hi Michael, Yes, that would be great, if possible. Thank you, Ines On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:56 AM Michael Richardson wrote: > > Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > > 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest..." It would be > nice to add > > reference/s here > > Well,

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

2020-07-12 Thread Michael Richardson
Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > 1- It would be nice to add in Terminology section that the document uses the > terminology of RFC7030 and RFC5272 > 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest..." It would be nice to add > reference/s here > 3- Security

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

2020-07-12 Thread Michael Richardson
Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest..." It would be nice to add > reference/s here Well, I'm not sure how I can add a reference to private emails. I can ask the implementers to write a public email if that is intended. Please advise.