Stewart and Alissa,
I have reviewed Chister's response for this issue and re-read RFC4091/4092,
and now agree with Christer: We can remove the section about ANAT and
references to RFC4091/4092.
Best Regards,
_
Roman Shpount
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 12:52 PM Roman Shpount wrote:
> St
Stewart and Alissa,
Thank you for the review. The references for RFC 4091 and RFC 4092 are
intentional and describe relationship with previous obsoleted
implementations. There are still deployed implementations of RFC 4091 and
RFC 4092 and ice-sip-sdp states that ICE implementations should be
pre
