Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

Stewart, thanks for your review. Sean, thanks for the updates. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Feb 27, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > > > >> On Feb 27, 2018, at 11:21, Russ Housley wrote: >> >> Minor issues:

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 11:21, Russ Housley wrote: > > >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> I think convention is to list the documents being updated in the Abstract, >>> but >>> cannot find any formal guidance. >> >> You’re right that is the convention, but it’s not required.

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

>> Minor issues: >> >> I think convention is to list the documents being updated in the Abstract, >> but >> cannot find any formal guidance. > > You’re right that is the convention, but it’s not required. > draft-flanagan-7322bis is attempting to make including updates in the > abstract a

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:55, Sean Turner wrote: > > > >> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:51, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> >> On 02/27/2018 08:11 AM, Sean Turner wrote: >>> There are two states for the Recommended column: YES and NO. I can go >>> either way on

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:55, Salz, Rich wrote: > > >> I thought we had always been clear that it was "not marked as >> recommended", i.e., "we make no comment about its status". > > That was my understanding to. The choices are "recommended" or "no comment” Yes, but we

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:51, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On 02/27/2018 08:11 AM, Sean Turner wrote: >> There are two states for the Recommended column: YES and NO. I can go >> either way on whether >> marked as not recommended = NO >> not marked as recommended = NO >> >> WG

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

>I thought we had always been clear that it was "not marked as > recommended", i.e., "we make no comment about its status". That was my understanding to. The choices are "recommended" or "no comment" ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

On 02/27/2018 08:11 AM, Sean Turner wrote: > There are two states for the Recommended column: YES and NO. I can go either > way on whether > marked as not recommended = NO > not marked as recommended = NO > > WG - thoughts? I thought we had always been clear that it was "not marked as