In your previous mail you wrote:
> I just wanted to check if you Francis feel that the issues have been
> adequately addressed. FWIW, I read the document with the respect to the
> major issues raised in your review at least, and thought that the -09
> was clear enough for me.
=> oops, it see
Francis, Ben, thank you for the review and taking it into account.
I just wanted to check if you Francis feel that the issues have been adequately
addressed. FWIW, I read the document with the respect to the major issues
raised in your review at least, and thought that the -09 was clear enough f
In your previous mail you wrote:
> I believe the RFC editor allows either English or American
> spellings so long as the document is consistent.
=> in fact I believe the RFC editor is chartered to allow any language...
Regards
francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
___
On 03/01/2013 12:11 PM, Francis Dupont wrote:
>> > > - 1 page 5: misbehaviours -> misbehaviors
>> > > (and 3.3 page 16, and others too)
>> >
>> > I am not American.
> => nor I am: I just applied an american English spell checker and
> reported what it considered as spelling errors. Note t
