Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-21 Thread Pete Resnick
On 9/18/12 8:45 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: Nits/editorial comments: -- IDNits has some complaints; please check. They were checked. -- The abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721 It does. -- section 2.1, 2nd paragraph: The character encoding format of maildrops may not

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-21 Thread Pete Resnick
On 9/21/12 10:23 AM, Pete Resnick wrote: -- The abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721 It does. Sorry. You said abstract, not intro. Got it. pr -- Pete Resnickhttp://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/ Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-21 Thread Glen Zorn
On 09/21/2012 10:44 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: On 9/21/12 10:23 AM, Pete Resnick wrote: -- The abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721 Why? There is a statement in the header, 10 lines above the abstract, that says Obsoletes: 5721 (if approved). It does. Sorry. You said

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-21 Thread Ben Campbell
On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Glen Zorn glenz...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/21/2012 10:44 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: On 9/21/12 10:23 AM, Pete Resnick wrote: -- The abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721 Why? There is a statement in the header, 10 lines above the abstract, that

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-21 Thread Dave Crocker
On 9/21/2012 8:23 AM, Pete Resnick wrote: On 9/18/12 8:45 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:abstract should mention that this obsoletes 5721 It does. Stylistic point: RFCs last a long time. Including ephemeral information can be distracting, especially in the Abstract. 5 and 10 years from now,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-21 Thread Ben Campbell
Thanks for the response! On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Pete Resnick presn...@qualcomm.com wrote: [...] -- same paragraph : The UTF8 command MAY fail. Under what circumstances? (this seems sort of tacked onto the paragraph--does it belong there?) AFAICT, it is simply a warning to

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-18 Thread Ben Campbell
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07 Reviewer:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-18 Thread Ben Campbell
On Sep 18, 2012, at 8:18 PM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-18 Thread Ben Campbell
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07 Reviewer:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5721bis-07,

2012-09-18 Thread Ben Campbell
On Sep 18, 2012, at 8:18 PM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call