I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-behave-multicast-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 3 oct 2006 IETF LC Date: 2 oct 2006 IESG Telechat date: not known yet Summary: Ready Comments: I have two very minor suggestions: - 2.1 page 4: in "as if it was a host" was -> is (or were)? (I propose to let the RFC editor decide) - some lines after, I believe the fact "This document is a companion document to "NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP" [I-D.ietf-behave-nat-udp]." should be exposed as soon as possible, i.e., in the introduction (section 2), for instance between NAT/NAPT (first paragraph) and PIM/IGMP (second paragraph). BTW this can be done in the behave-nat-udp draft itself, for instance in its applicability statement (just another change). I don't believe to add an informative reference from it to this document would be a problem. Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
