Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-sweet-rfc2911bis-09

Thanks for the review, Russ & thanks Michael for taking it into account. I trust that these changes will find their way into the document, and have balloted No Objection. Jari On 26 Jul 2016, at 23:54, Michael Sweet wrote: > Russ, > > Thank you for reviewing this

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-sweet-rfc2911bis-09

Russ, Thank you for reviewing this (admittedly long) document. Responses to your questions and comments are inline below... > On Jul 26, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > ... > Major Concerns: > > It seems that [PWG5100.12] specifies IPP Version 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-sweet-rfc2911bis-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please