Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Server Time

2017-02-22 Thread nalini.elkins
t; <draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option@ietf.org>; Michael Ackermann <mackerm...@bcbsm.com>; Robert Hamilton <rhamil...@cas.org>; MORTON ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:43 AM Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Server Time

2017-02-22 Thread jouni.nospam
rt Hamilton > <rhamil...@cas.org>; MORTON ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:03 AM > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Server Time > > Resending. Somehow the last email was cut off. > > Nalini

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Server Time

2017-02-21 Thread nalini.elkins
Jouni, Here is the thread for your second major comment: Major comment #2 from you: >2) The PDM option relation to actual "server" time is somewhat confusing and >the 5-tuple does not allow me to detect the real relationship between the >>server/application action that caused the generation