Hi, Peter.
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 20:23 +, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Apologies for the slow reply, currently travelling with limited Internet
access...
NP.
Mainly about the rehandshake point (below)...
I think the other points are sorted.
Header/Abstract/Intro: Doesn't this update RFC 6347
On Jun 15, 2014, at 09:23, Elwyn Davies elw...@dial.pipex.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 06:52 -0400, Sean Turner wrote:
On Jun 15, 2014, at 09:23, Elwyn Davies elw...@dial.pipex.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Apologies for the slow reply, currently travelling with limited Internet
access...
Header/Abstract/Intro: Doesn't this update RFC 6347 and either or both of RFC
6066 and RFC 5246 since it defines a new extension?
It doesn't really update any other RFC, it does add a new extension but then
the
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-tls-encrypt-then-mac-02.txt
