Dale, thanks for your review. Dave, all, thanks for your responses. It looks
like the issues are close to cleared up. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 10, 2021, at 8:30 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 2/8/2021 7:42 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>> After sending my previous
On 2/8/2021 7:42 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
After sending my previous message, I realized that I had gone to length
explaining why I considered the term "accompanying" to be ill-defined,
but I had forgotten to mention that in my review, I'd added "Or perhaps
this should be forward-referenced to
Dave Crocker writes:
> I suppose a clarification could be added along the lines of:
>
> OLD:
> The emoji(s) express a recipient's summary reaction to the specific
> message referenced by the accompanying In-Reply-To header field.
> [Mail-Fmt].
>
> NEW:
> The emoji(s) express a
On 1/30/2021 3:13 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
Finally, I think a couple of word choices could be better. So how about:
Having seen no objections, I've replaced the draft's existing text with
Ned's proposed alternative.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
On 1/31/2021 2:16 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
Dave Crocker writes:
On 1/27/2021 6:32 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker wrote:
The emoji(s) express a recipient's summary reaction to the specific
message referenced by the accompanying In-Reply-To header field.
[Mail-Fmt].
This is
Dave Crocker writes:
> On 1/27/2021 6:32 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker wrote:
>> Reviewer: Dale Worley
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
First to deal with the straightfoward points:
>> The emoji(s) express a recipient's summary reaction to the specific
>> message referenced by the
I'm having a little difficulty following the discussion of the text, so I
took a look at the text itself. It currently (-07) says:
The rule emoji_sequence is inherited from [Emoji-Seq]. It permits
one or more bytes to form a single presentation image.
The rule base-emojis MAY be used as
> > 2. Reaction Content-Disposition
> >
> >
> > The rule emoji_sequence is inherited from [Emoji-Seq]. It permits
> > one or more bytes to form a single presentation image.
> >
> > I haven't traced the definition of emoji_sequence, but it seems to be
> > essentially a set of Unicode
Reviewer: Dale Worley
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
