Hi Jaime,
Beautiful.
This problem is not in the XML generated by kramdown-rfc or in the TXT or HTML
generated from that by xml2rfc, it occurs from scratch only in xml2rfc’s (v
3.7.0) v2v3 conversion output generated from that. This appears to be new, I
haven’t seen it before.
Tracking down
Hi Carsten,
Small nit. I had a quick read of the diff and although section 2 looks good
with the new HTML and CSS, the formula looks mangled in the data tracker format
("present(fc)⋅2").
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03.txt
Ciao!
--
Jaime Jiménez
On Sun,
Elwyn, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following
discussion. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Based on my
checks, the latest version addresses your review issues; please let me know if
you disagree.
Lars
> On 2021-5-3, at 21:56, Elwyn Davies via
Hi Elwyn,
I finally got around to process your review.
I have submitted a new version -03 based on this review.
I could make direct use of your text suggestions, but did edit them a little.
So you may want to have another look at the second paragraph of 1
(introduction) and the new section 2.2,
Apologies... Somewhere my memory has become garbled. You are quite right RFC Editor is relentlessly focused on double quotes. I obviously getting too old for this job.Cheers,ElwynOn 3 May 2021 21:25, Carsten Bormann wrote:On 2021-05-03, at 22:10, Elwyn Davies wrote:
>
> Hi, Carsten.
>
>
On 2021-05-03, at 22:10, Elwyn Davies wrote:
>
> Hi, Carsten.
>
> My understanding is
>
> RFC editor position: use single quotes for everything.
Wasn’t that way for my first 42 RFCs :-)
> Standard US view apparently.
US view is actually rather unanimously double quotes (outside any
Hi, Carsten.My understanding isRFC editor position: use single quotes for everything. Standard US view apparently.British position (my version): long passages, especially direct speech quotes to be enclosed in double quotes. Odd words and short phrases within sentences use single quotes.
Hi Elwyn,
thank you for this substantive review.
We’ll get to the details soon, but I’m intrigued by this:
> General: The RFC Editor preferes the US convention for quoting items using
> exclusively singe quote rather than double quote marks.
Last time I looked at this, I gained the impression
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
