Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

2019-07-03 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jul 3, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: > And I think that's a problem. > > What does a NOTIMP mean to the client? Most of the draft says "The server > doesn't implement DSO". It doesn't say "doesn't implement DSO for this > particular set of bits in this query". Section 6.2.2 says

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

2019-07-03 Thread Robert Sparks
On 7/2/19 4:24 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote: On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: Issue: The discussion of recursive resolvers in section 6.1 may need additional consideration. In particular, the recommendation to pass a received error code along to a client has, I

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

2019-07-02 Thread Tom Pusateri
> On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Issue: > > The discussion of recursive resolvers in section 6.1 may need additional > consideration. In particular, the recommendation to pass a received error code > along to a client has, I think, some unintended

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnssd-push-20

2019-06-28 Thread Robert Sparks via Datatracker
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For