Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-05

2020-12-01 Thread Barry Leiba
> And yeah - if the latest mmark is causing artifacts I'll see what I can do > about those. I admit I didn't > read through the whole thing in detail again after making the last updates. If it's easy to fix, please do, but don't get too wrapped up in spending time on that: the RFC Editor will

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-05

2020-11-30 Thread Bron Gondwana
Thanks Pete, fair enough - I can see how a semantically pointless example is a problem. I'll update that in my copy and wait for any other review changes before uploading again. And yeah - if the latest mmark is causing artifacts I'll see what I can do about those. I admit I didn't read

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-05

2020-11-30 Thread Pete Resnick via Datatracker
Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For