Joel, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this
document based on my own review.
Lars
> On 2022-9-22, at 1:50, Joel Halpern via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The Gen
Hi Joel
It was for this specific area it was requested. We did explore an
automated/mechanical way of doing this but in the end, it was easier to do by
hand. The organization of this MIB maps closely to the YANG model. In other
cases, I have dealt with existing MIBs and new YANG this is not the
That suffices for the document and my review. Whether it suffices for
the community and IESG is up to them. (I wonder about the precedent of
defining MIBs for monitoring every new thing we do. But that is up to
others, not something you can fix in this document.)
Yours,
Joel
On 9/29/2022
Hi Joel
The reason this was requested by the community is that there is SNMP management
equipment deployed that they would like to be able use for monitoring IP-TFS.
I suggest I add this text to clearify.
OLD:
The objects defined here are the same as [I-D.ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs] with the
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more inf
