Christer, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following
discussion. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document based on the
current revision that addressed the issue Christer identified.
Lars
> On 2022-4-11, at 23:35, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
On April 12, 2022 at 3:14:41 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
> > On 11 Apr 2022, at 22:35, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker wrote:
Hi!
Sorry I missed this before.
...
> > Section 3 says:
> >
> > "If a LISP device receives a LISP message containing a Vendor Specific
> > LCAF with an OUI that it does
Hi,
Thanks for addressing my comments, and for explaining the reason for
Experimental :)
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Iannone
Sent: tiistai 12. huhtikuuta 2022 10.14
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf@ietf.org;
Hi Christer, Luigi,
Thanks for the review Christer. I agree with your comments and with Luigi’s
suggestions. We’ll edit the draft to include the feedback in the next iteration.
Thanks!
Alberto
From: Luigi Iannone
Date: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 9:15 AM
To: Christer Holmberg
Cc:
Hi Christer,
Thanks for the review.
As a shepherd I have a couple of comments inline.
> On 11 Apr 2022, at 22:35, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
