Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

2023-08-10 Thread Smith, Ned
+1 From: Ines Robles Date: Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 1:53 PM To: "lgl securitytheory.com" Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-rats-eat@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" , "r...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21 Resent-From: Resent-To: , , , ,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

2023-08-10 Thread Ines Robles
Many thanks Laurence for addressing my comments and for the providing clarifications I understand the provided motive to not imply the trust to be static. Perhaps, one way to convey the potentially varying degree of trust dependant on context can be achieved by replacing "wishes" (which is

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

2023-08-10 Thread lgl securitytheory . com
The PR to address these is here: https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/eat/pull/403 Comments below. > On Aug 9, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Ines Robles via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

2023-08-09 Thread Ines Robles via Datatracker
Reviewer: Ines Robles Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more