Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

2022-03-29 Thread Christer Holmberg
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org ; gen-art@ietf.org ; RTCWeb IETF ; draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02 Thanks Sean. I finally concluded that was the intent. And I think technically it says so. If you could

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

2022-03-28 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Thanks Sean. I finally concluded that was the intent. And I think technically it says so. If you could look at making that more clear early, it would probably help those readers who are not as familiar with the cited W3C API. Yours, Joel On 3/28/2022 10:47 PM, Sean Turner wrote: On Mar

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

2022-03-28 Thread Sean Turner
> On Mar 27, 2022, at 13:49, Joel Halpern via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

2022-03-27 Thread Joel Halpern via Datatracker
Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For