Pete, thanks for your reviews. Mahesh, thanks for your responses. I have
entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani
> wrote:
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Trimming it down even more.
>
>> On Jun 20, 2018, at 5:18 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mahesh,
Hi Pete,
Trimming it down even more.
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 5:18 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> Trimming a bit:
>
> On 20 Jun 2018, at 0:36, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>
>
>>> 3.1 - s/The test session name that MUST be identical/The test session name,
>>> which MUST be identical
Hi Mahesh,
Trimming a bit:
On 20 Jun 2018, at 0:36, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
3.1 - s/The test session name that MUST be identical/The test session
name,
which MUST be identical (Unless you mean something really weird that
I don't
think you mean. If you don't see the difference, then trust
Hi Pete,
> On Jun 19, 2018, at 9:02 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a
