Re: [Gen-art] Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard

Hi, Aaron, (dropping the IETF discussion list from the cc: list) I think we're good, except on this point: 2.2. Action reject The reject action cancels the implicit keep and refuses delivery of a message. The reason string is a UTF-8 [UTF-8] string specifying the reason for refusal.

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard

On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: Hi, Aaron, (dropping the IETF discussion list from the cc: list) I think we're good, except on this point: 2.2. Action reject The reject action cancels the implicit keep and refuses delivery of a message. The reason string is a

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard

Me too! :-( I'm about to send out a pile of responses, and I've updated the draft to include the DISCUSS and LC wording changes suggested in September. Document is here: http://sodabrew.com/ietf/draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-08.txt Diffs from -07 are here:

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: