Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-07.txt

2013-03-01 Thread Ben Laurie
On 1 March 2013 12:11, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > >> > Minor issues: > > => BTW I received a side comment stating the document is too long > and should be split into 3 parts (maths, mechanisms, application). > Of course you may answer it is too late... I do. Way

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-07.txt

2013-03-01 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: > > Minor issues: => BTW I received a side comment stating the document is too long and should be split into 3 parts (maths, mechanisms, application). Of course you may answer it is too late... > > - section 2 is not enough accurate, for instance: > > * th

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-07.txt

2013-02-22 Thread Ben Laurie
On 18 February 2013 14:53, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you ma

[Gen-art] review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-07.txt

2013-02-18 Thread Francis Dupont
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-07.txt Reviewe