, 2014 10:31 AM
To: Moriarty, Kathleen; Sean P. Turner
Cc: francis.dup...@fdupont.fr; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03.txt
Thanks for your review, Francis, and for your edits, Kathleen.
Do you
Thanks for your review, Francis, and for your edits, Kathleen.
Do you Kathleen or Sean think that Francis' comment on strengthening the
security considerations would be something that you should address?
jari
On Jan 13, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Moriarty, Kathleen kathleen.moria...@emc.com
wrote:
, January 21, 2014 10:31 AM
To: Moriarty, Kathleen; Sean P. Turner
Cc: francis.dup...@fdupont.fr; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03.txt
Thanks for your review, Francis, and for your edits, Kathleen.
Do you
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03.txt
Thank you for the review, Francis.
Once this version is published, change control and copyright is transferred to
the IETF. The next version of this document will work to improve known issues.
I will make the change from public/private to private/public as noted, that
makes sense. I would
Hi Francis,
I went to update your comments in my draft version and in thinking about it
more, I agree with the current text on the public/private order. As I read it,
the referenced keys are discussed for the keys that validate and I assume you
read it as the creation of a signature or to
