> On Aug 17, 2016, at 8:20 PM, Paul Giralt (pgiralt) wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 17, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> Back to the current document: I have reread s3 of RFC 7206 and there are
>>> some points that need to be sorted out:
>>>
>>> -
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
>> Back to the current document: I have reread s3 of RFC 7206 and there are
>> some points that need to be sorted out:
>>
>> - The term 'end-to-end' is given a slightly specialized meaning in RFC 7206.
>> This is
Cc:
General area reviewing team <gen-art@ietf.org>,
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art
LC2/Telechat review of
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24
On 17 Aug 2016, at 12:04, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Hi, Ben.
>
> Having read Barry's proposed up
On 17 Aug 2016, at 12:04, Elwyn Davies wrote:
Hi, Ben.
Having read Barry's proposed update for RFC 3967, I would be happy
for that to become the status quo. However, I would distinguish
between truly foundational documents that are produced in tandem with
the protocol standards or
Hi, Ben.
Having read Barry's proposed update for RFC 3967, I would be happy for
that to become the status quo. However, I would distinguish between
truly foundational documents that are produced in tandem with the
protocol standards or subsequently (as mentioned in Barry's draft) and
what
Hi -
I agree with Ben on all points. One inline point that bears reinforcement:
> I believe the working group intent was that the definitions stated in RFC
> 7206 are the ones used in the protocol.
This is exactly right. In fact, this was a very tedious and drawn out process
where we had
Hi Elwyn:
Responsible AD Hat on:
I'm going to enter a DISCUSS position, to make sure this point gets
discussion among the IESG before this progresses. The whole point of the
repeated last call was to get feedback on the downref, and this
certainly counts :-)
All hats off:
As an
19:58 (GMT+00:00) To: Elwyn Davies <elw...@folly.org.uk> Cc:
General area reviewing team <gen-art@ietf.org>,
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@ietf.org Subject: Re: Gen-art LC2/Telechat
review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24
On 12 Aug 2016, at 10:40, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> I am
On 12 Aug 2016, at 10:40, Elwyn Davies wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new