Hi Robert,
Thanks now for BOTH of your reviews. I've a number of proposals below.
On 9/7/17 5:51 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> There is one aspect of caching semantics we should probably capture,
> which is that the cache-validity period should exceed the HTTP cache
> or expiry period as
Apologies for being a little laggy -
Some comments inline.
On 8/31/17 2:07 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
Robert,
As I wrote earlier, this was a great review. Thanks for that. Please
see below.
On 8/30/17 7:21 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Almost Ready
This
Robert,
As I wrote earlier, this was a great review. Thanks for that. Please
see below.
On 8/30/17 7:21 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> This is an exciting concept, and the draft overall is approachable. I
> have identified a few areas I
This draft raises some fascinating questions. One is "How do we ensure
that the manufacturer cannot proscribe the uses of a device that it is
capable of and that its purchaser desires?" Another is "How do we
ensure that the manufacturer cannot reduce the permitted uses of the
device after its